Top Down Estimating for the PMP Exam

Top Down estimating is a project estimating technique whereby the overall project is estimated first, and individual tasks are apportioned from it. You start from the top of the pyramid and work downwards.

This approach shines when budgets are fixed or scope must align with limited funding, a reality for most projects far from the lavish resources of King Tut’s tomb.

Unlike Bottom Up Estimating, where task-level estimates roll up to form the total, Top-Down starts big and drills down, offering a strategic lens for the PMP exam and real-world projects.

Accuracy

In top down estimating, individual task estimates are only as accurate as the overall project estimate they are derived from. If the overall estimate is incorrect, not even sacrifices to the sun god Ra will make the individual task estimates any more accurate. And because projects are normally tracked via individual tasks, this could lead to issues during the project when individual tasks are incorrectly apportioned, even though the overall estimate is correct. This introduces an additional level of risk over Bottom Up Estimating, and we all know the proverbial mummies practically spring out of their tombs when project estimates are inaccurate.

Cost Estimating

In the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK), there are three estimating levels which are used for individual tasks:

Analogous Estimating is the determination of an estimate based on previous, similar projects, for example, the neighbor’s fence cost $10,000 therefore ours should cost $12,000.
Parametric Estimating involves the use of a unit cost times a number of units. The unit cost can come from previous projects, or from industry-wide published data. For example, the neighbor’s fence cost $10/foot.
Three Point Estimating. This method involves the determination of an optimistic, pessimistic, and most likely estimate. The final estimated value can be derived using either the triangular distribution:
E = (a + m + b) / 3

or the beta distribution:

E = (a + 4m + b) / 6
- E = Final estimated cost
- a = Optimistic estimate
- m = Most Likely estimate
- b = Pessimistic estimate

Although these formulas may seem like hieroglyphs, three point estimating is fairly intuitive once you get a handle on it. It’s a powerful method that takes into account project risks, and can be used in conjunction with the other two budgeting methods.

The Overall Project Budget

Top Down Estimating is one of two procedures to producing a project budget, which is known for tracking purposes as the Estimate at Completion (EAC). The other one is:

Bottom Up Estimating is the determination of individual task estimates first, followed by rolling up the task estimates into an overall project estimate.

Bottom Up Estimating is more common, because Top Down is largely restricted to situations where a budget has been determined in advance and the project manager must determine the project scope that fits the budget.

In conclusion, you can keep the mummies in their tombs by using top down estimating to determine project level estimates first and then apportioning it down to the individual task level estimates.